Helmet Car

Motorbike Helmet Laws, Human Behaviour & The Organ Donor Effect
It is a fiercely debated topic among bikers, politicians and recently the people of Missouri.
It’s a ‘freedom of choice’ debate for many, questioning why the legislators feel they know what individuals need better than themselves. It is also a scale issue, how extensive should laws be to protect life and where should the line be drawn? Laws state that an individual is not allowed to intentionally end their own life, helmet laws attempt to reduce the risk of death, how far will legislators go to protect life and what effect will this have on the quality of life for the individual?
Of course it isn’t that simple, we’re not all only individuals but together we make up a society and sometimes the actions of individuals can have positive and negative effects on other individuals and on wider society.
So the debate widens to consider costs and benefits to society. I’m not going to go into this area in detail because most of the costs and benefits have already been widely discussed previously. Considerations include the immediate loss of life to a rider who is involved in a fatal accident, any pillion rider who is unfortunate enough to be involved, and any other parties who are involved in the accident. Pillion riders, like passengers in car accidents form a sad statistic as the accident is normally completely outside of their control, yet they bear the same consequences. Considerations also include hospital services, police investigations, legal inquiries, and road clean up and repair work. Individual freedom of choice should hold strong consideration, and the fact that the use or non-use of amotorcycle helmet doesn’t directly effect the health of anyone else other than themselves (ignoring the Organ Donor Effect).
The Organ Donor Effect – Mitigating the cost of motorcycle accidents on society? It isn’t a new concept, but one that has received revived publicity lately following the Missouri motorbike helmet law saga. For me the relationship between motorcycle accidents and organ donations is interesting because people will use the same relationship to argue both for and against crash helmet laws. You can even find motorcyclists citing the relationship in their arguments against motorcycle helmet laws. This multi use of the same argument is interesting, any use of the argument is in fact bizarre because the effect implies different values on the lives of motorcyclists compared to humans on the organ donation waiting list. Are not the lives of all humans valued equally? Of course they are not, if they were politicians would not be sending our young men to war but be going themselves, but that is off topic. So what is the Organ Donor Effect? Statistics show a relationship exists between motorbike helmet use and the number of fatal motorcycle accidents from head trauma. Compulsory helmet laws increase helmet use, causing a corresponding decrease in rider fatalities. The Organ Donor Effect is the statistical relationship between a decrease in head trauma related motorcycle rider fatalities and a corresponding decrease in healthy organ donations. Motorcycle riders tend to be young and healthy and have an above average likelihood of providing healthy organs following death from head trauma. Statistics have shown that for every motorcycle accident fatality from head trauma, 0.33 deaths have been delayed on the organ waiting list. Note that it is not a one to one relationship, but rather three riders have to die to save one person in need of an organ.
The argument against helmet laws citing the Organ Donor Effect tends to be along the lines of that the enactment of crash helmet laws will reduce the number of organ donations every year causing a corresponding increase in the number of deaths on the organ waiting list.
An argument for helmet laws citing the Organ Donor Effect is statistically stronger, consider that for every three biker deaths, only one persons life in need of an organ will be saved (extended). So unless the lives of bikers are somehow less important than everyone else, the Organ Donor Effect as an argument for, or against motorbike helmet legislation is irrelevant.
Butterfly Effect – Actions can have reactions further away than may initially be considered. The Organ Donor Effect when considering motorcycle helmet legislation is an interesting example of a Butterfly Effect. The use of helmets don’t only effect those immediately involved in a motorcycle accident, but can also effect third parties which you would not immediately consider – those on organ donor waiting lists. But just because there is a relationship, doesn’t mean it is an important relationship and doesn’t mean that it deserves to be considered in the debate.
More serious helmet law considerations should be around half helmets and other minimalistic helmets which offer questionable protection. If these helmet styles qualify as adequate protection under law, but do not actually adequately protect the human head in a motorcycle accident. It begs the question of whether there is any point to having the helmet laws in the first place.
In most debates that consider individual choice versus legislative control I personally favour individual choice.
But in this debate I considered two ideas, firstly whether motorcycle helmets are a good thing for people to wear and secondly whether individuals have the capability to choose for themselves uninfluenced by other people. In this situation after much thought I decided that given the choice I would vote in favour of compulsory helmet laws for all ages. Because when helmet use becomes the norm there is no longer a question of whether it is cooler to ride with or without a helmet, everyone just wears one. Ideally I would like there to be no helmet laws and every individual able to make his or her own choice, but unfortunately I don’t believe the individuals would be able to make their own choice, but rather be influenced too heavily by media, other riders, and the individual’s perception of what is ‘cool’. Peer pressure is commonly considered a child and teenager issue but I believe it is simply a human characteristic. To want to do as others do, the desire to be accepted, desire to fit in, desire to stand out. I believe that the majority of riders given the option of wearing a helmet or not would base their decision on what they believe others would think of them (what image they will portray). It is this unfortunate human characteristic that moves me in support of compulsory motorbike helmet laws.
If everyone was not influenced by everyone else, then people would be capable of thinking for themselves and all self respecting individuals would wear motorcycle crash helmets anyway.
James Lamport-Burr is a full time Financial Accountant and part-time Internet Marketer. Who’s passions include business, stock markets, sports and making the most of life. James is an avid motorcyclist and currently rides a 1996 MuZ Skorpion Tour.
MotorcycleHelmetCritic.com
For Motorcycle Helmet information including how they actually protect your head in an accident. Plus motorcycle crash helmets and helmet accessories.
About the Author
Helmet – Crashing Foreign Cars
|
|
NFL Denver Broncos 12-Inch Vinyl Helmet Magnet $9.38 Tell the world youre a fan with your team magnetic banner. On your car, around the office, or at home, your magnetic banner looks great! It adheres magnetically, or use thumbtacks to attach to non metal surfaces. It’s made of heavy gauge magnetic vinyl, so it lasts and lasts. Colors stay bright, indoors or out! Plus, it’s flexible, so it looks great on curved surfaces. The magnet is 12 inches in… |
|
|
Ayrton Senna in McLaren MP4-5 at 1989 British Grand Prix Photo Mugs Ayrton Senna in the McLaren MP4-5 at 1989 British Grand Prix, Silverstone…. |
|
|
NFL Houston Texans 12-Inch Vinyl Helmet Magnet $11.88 Show your team spirit proudly with this 12″ Vinyl Magnet. Each 12″ magnet is made of heavy guage magnetic vinyl and sticks to any metal surface. The officially licensed magnet is decorated in the team colors great for car doors…. |
|
|
The King’s Bling $1.99 … |
|
|
Helmet Head $1.99 … |
|
|
Jackass Vol. 3: Episode 2 $1.99 … |
|
|
BlueMagic 750 Plastic & Plexiglass Cleaner – 8 fl. oz. $6.50 BlueMagic Plastic and Plexiglass cleaner and light scratch remover removes hairline scratches from all plastic and plexiglass surfaces. Gently removes light scratches and hazing and safely cleans all plastic and plexiglass. Great for convertible tops, plastic windows, helmet visors, aircraft windows, CDs, windscreens, eyeglasses, instrument panels, computer screens and all clear plastics…. |
|
|
One Dozen (12) Rubber Ducky Duck Duckie Race Car Birthday Party Favors [Toy] $6.50 This set of 12 rubber duckies are the perfect party favors for little boys. Each ducky measures approx. 2″ x 2″. They do not squeak but do have a hole in their beak for squirting water. They are not guaranteed to float upright…. |
|
|
Racing Helmets (8) Party Supplies $28.69 Assorted color racing helmets…. |
|
|
Midland 22540 Headset Speaker with Boom Microphone $9.99 The Midland 22-540 headset speaker with boom microphone will make conversing on your Midland family radio easier and more convenient. Plug the headset into your radio and you are all set for hands-free operation. It’s a great option when you are skiing, snowboarding, even doing garden work. It comes with an adjustable headband and a cushioned earpiece for added comfort and fit. Use the Midlan… |